The effect of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine as an analgesic adjuvant to balanced general anesthesia and enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery

  • Ibrahim F
  • Mohamed S
  • Hamid H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Intravenous dexmedetomidine and lidocaine have been shown to decrease perioperative surgical pain and analgesic consumption and facilitate the return of bowel function, decreasing post-operative hospitalization. Results: On the first post-operative day, VAS score and total consumption of narcotics were statistically insignificant between the two groups. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the Lidocaine group all through the surgery (p value < 0.001). Post-operative nausea and vomiting were statistically higher in group D than in group L (p value 0.001). Conclusions: The administration of either lidocaine or dexmedetomidine did not show superiority in post-operative analgesia or perioperative narcotics consumption. However, lidocaine infusion showed less drug-related side effects from the aspect of intraoperative hemodynamics stability, post-operative ileus, nausea, and vomiting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ibrahim, F. H., Mohamed, S. A., Hamid, H. M. A. E., Rabie, A. H., & Derh, M. S. E. (2022). The effect of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine as an analgesic adjuvant to balanced general anesthesia and enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-022-00258-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free