Clinical Prediction Models for Heart Failure Hospitalization in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

12Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models have been developed for hospitalization for heart failure in type 2 diabetes. However, a systematic evaluation of these models’ performance, applicability, and clinical impact is absent. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Tufts’ clinical prediction registry through February 2021. Studies needed to report the development, validation, clinical impact, or update of a prediction model for hospitalization for heart failure in type 2 diabetes with measures of model performance and sufficient information for clinical use. Model assessment was done with the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and meta-analyses of model discrimination were performed. We included 15 model development and 3 external validation studies with data from 999 167 people with type 2 diabetes. Of the 15 models, 6 had undergone external validation and only 1 had low concern for risk of bias and applicability (Risk Equations for Complications of Type 2 Diabetes). Seven models were presented in a clinically useful manner (eg, risk score, online calculator) and 2 models were classified as the most suitable for clinical use based on study design, external validity, and point-of-care usability. These were Risk Equations for Complications of Type 2 Diabetes (meta-analyzed c-statistic, 0.76) and the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Heart Failure in Diabetes (metaanalyzed c-statistic, 0.78), which was the simplest model with only 5 variables. No studies reported clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: Most prediction models for hospitalization for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes have potential concerns with risk of bias or applicability, and uncertain external validity and clinical impact. Future research is needed to address these knowledge gaps.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53546Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls

5056Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

4895Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Predicting and preventing heart failure in type 2 diabetes

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimal Screening for Predicting and Preventing the Risk of Heart Failure among Adults with Diabetes Without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Pooled Cohort Analysis

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deep-learning-based prognostic modeling for incident heart failure in patients with diabetes using electronic health records: A retrospective cohort study

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Razaghizad, A., Oulousian, E., Randhawa, V. K., Ferreira, J. P., Brophy, J. M., Greene, S. J., … Sharma, A. (2022). Clinical Prediction Models for Heart Failure Hospitalization in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024833

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 9

64%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

67%

Computer Science 2

13%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free