Adaptive, Dose-finding Phase 2 Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-089 in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease

21Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

ABT-089, an α 4 β 2 neuronal nicotinic receptor partial agonist, was evaluated for efficacy and safety in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease patients receiving stable doses of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. This phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, and dose-finding study adaptively randomized patients to receive ABT-089 (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, or 35 mg once daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, cognition subscale (ADAS-Cog) total score. A Bayesian response-adaptive randomization algorithm dynamically assigned allocation probabilities based on interim ADAS-Cog total scores. A normal dynamic linear model for dose-response relationships and a longitudinal model for predicting final ADAS-cog score were employed in the algorithm. Stopping criteria for futility or success were defined. The futility stopping criterion was met, terminating the study with 337 patients randomized. No dose-response relationship was observed and no dose demonstrated statistically significant improvement over placebo on ADAS-Cog or any secondary endpoint. ABT-089 was well tolerated at all dose levels. When administered as adjunctive therapy to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, ABT-089 was not efficacious in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. The adaptive study design enabled the examination of a broad dose range, enabled rapid determination of futility, and reduced patient exposure to nonefficacious doses of the investigational compound.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lenz, R. A., Pritchett, Y. L., Berry, S. M., Llano, D. A., Han, S., Berry, D. A., … Saltarelli, M. D. (2015). Adaptive, Dose-finding Phase 2 Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-089 in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 29(3), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free