Seated cuff blood pressure-lowering efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

1Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a common co-morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and well tolerated, effective therapies are needed to achieve guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) goals in these patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to present the results of a prespecified analysis of key secondary endpoints from a 12-week, open-label, single-arm study evaluating the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Study Design and Methods: After a placebo run-in period, 192 patients received olmesartan medoxomil 20mg/day for 3 weeks. If BP remained ≥120/70mmHg, patients were uptitrated at 3-week intervals to olmesartanmedoxomil 40mg/day, olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 40/12.5mg/day, and olmesartan medoxomil/ HCTZ 40/25mg/day. Main Outcome Measure: Endpoints evaluated in this analysis were the change from baseline in mean seated cuff BP (SeBP), proportions of patients achieving SeBP goals, and distribution of SeBP reductions. Results: Mean SeBP was 158.1/90.0mmHg at baseline. The mean - standard error of BP reductions at 12 weeks for systolic and diastolic BP were 21.3 ± 1.1 mmHg and 9.8 ± 0.6 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001 for each). At the end of the study, the proportion of patients with diabetes achieving the recommended SeBP goal of < 130/80 mmHg was 41.1%. Conclusions: An olmesartan medoxomil±HCTZtreatment regimen significantly reduced BP from baseline in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes. © 2011 Kereiakes & Neutel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kereiakes, D. J., & Neutel, J. M. (2011). Seated cuff blood pressure-lowering efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs in R and D, 11(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.2165/11592830-000000000-00000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free