Analysis of root canal treated primary incisor after trauma

8Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The low number of clinical studies of traumatized teeth submitted to root canal treatment is completely out of proportion to the seriousness that dental trauma imposes on children in early years. Aim. This study evaluates the outcomes of root canal treatment (RCT) in traumatized primary incisors and identifies the predisposing factors associated with therapy success. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted with all dental records of 704 patients who had one or more teeth with traumatic injuries. Patients with irreversible pulp changes in primary teeth leading to RCT with a 24 month follow-up met the inclusion criteria. Results: Twenty-five maxillary incisors of 17 children were evaluated. The children's age at the time of therapy ranged from 24 to 72 months (mean 47.3). Pulp necrosis was the most common disorder (84.0%) and pre-operative periapical lesions were observed in 52.0%. Coronal discoloration was found in 48.0%. The roots were filled with ZOE paste (68.0%) or Guedes-Pinto paste (32.0%). Overall RCT success rate was 68.0%. The absence of pre-operative periapical lesions (p = 0.02) and pathological root resorption (p = 0.02) presented positive association with therapy success. Success was not associated to filling paste (p = 0.49), filling extent (p = 0.44), of discoloration (p = 0.39) nor the patients' age (p = 0.59). Conclusions: RCT was considered successful in 68.0% of the cases at the 24 month follow-up. Failure of RCT in traumatized primary incisors was associated with pre-operatory periapical lesions and pathological root resorption. The filling paste, the filling extent and the patient's age were unrelated with therapy success.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tannure, P. N., Fidalgo, T. K. S., Barcelos, R., Primo, L. G., & Maia, L. C. (2012). Analysis of root canal treated primary incisor after trauma. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 36(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.36.3.f8nv08266257v6g4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free