Fidelity is not easy! Challenges and guidelines for assessing fidelity in complex interventions

53Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Fidelity in complex behavioural interventions is underexplored and few comprehensive or detailed fidelity studies report on specific procedures for monitoring fidelity. Using Bellg’s popular Treatment Fidelity model, this paper aims to increase understanding of how to practically and comprehensively assess fidelity in complex, group-level, interventions. Approach and lessons learned: Drawing on our experience using a mixed methods approach to assess fidelity in the INFORM study (Improving Nursing home care through Feedback On perfoRMance data—INFORM), we report on challenges and adaptations experienced with our fidelity assessment approach and lessons learned. Six fidelity assessment challenges were identified: (1) the need to develop succinct tools to measure fidelity given tools tend to be intervention specific, (2) determining which components of fidelity (delivery, receipt, enactment) to emphasize, (3) unit of analysis considerations in group-level interventions, (4) missing data problems, (5) how to respond to and treat fidelity ‘failures’ and ‘deviations’ and lack of an overall fidelity assessment scheme, and (6) ensuring fidelity assessment doesn’t threaten internal validity. Recommendations and conclusions: Six guidelines, primarily applicable to group-level studies of complex interventions, are described to help address conceptual, methodological, and practical challenges with fidelity assessment in pragmatic trials. The current study offers guidance to researchers regarding key practical, methodological, and conceptual challenges associated with assessing fidelity in pragmatic trials. Greater attention to fidelity assessment and publication of fidelity results through detailed studies such as this one is critical for improving the quality of fidelity studies and, ultimately, the utility of published trials. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02695836. Registered on February 24, 2016

References Powered by Scopus

Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey

5068Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance

3754Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance

3284Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy-based interventions for maternal perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Delivery fidelity of the REACT (REtirement in ACTion) physical activity and behaviour maintenance intervention for community dwelling older people with mobility limitations

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association of Interprofessional Discharge Planning Using an Electronic Health Record Tool with Hospital Length of Stay among Patients with Multimorbidity: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ginsburg, L. R., Hoben, M., Easterbrook, A., Anderson, R. A., Estabrooks, C. A., & Norton, P. G. (2021). Fidelity is not easy! Challenges and guidelines for assessing fidelity in complex interventions. Trials, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05322-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

64%

Researcher 12

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 17

40%

Medicine and Dentistry 11

26%

Psychology 10

23%

Sports and Recreations 5

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free