Cavitation and its discontents: Opportunities for resolving current controversies

78Citations
Citations of this article
202Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cavitation has long been recognized as a key constraint on the structure and functional integrity of the xylem. Yet, recent results call into question how well we understand cavitation in plants. Here, we consider embolism formation in angiosperms at two scales. The first focuses on how air-seeding occurs at the level of pit membranes, raising the question of whether capillary failure is an appropriate physical model. The second addresses methodological uncertainties that affect our ability to infer the formation of embolism and its reversal in plant stems. Overall, our goal is to open up fresh perspectives on the structure-function relationships of xylem. © 2014 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels

4510Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pectin: Cell biology and prospects for functional analysis

1073Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A theory of coupled diffusion and large deformation in polymeric gels

882Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world's woody plant species

518Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new look at water transport regulation in plants

440Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Plant xylem hydraulics: What we understand, current research, and future challenges

361Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rockwell, F. E., Wheeler, J. K., & Holbrook, N. M. (2014). Cavitation and its discontents: Opportunities for resolving current controversies. Plant Physiology, 164(4), 1649–1660. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.233817

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 98

62%

Researcher 42

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 18

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109

73%

Environmental Science 24

16%

Engineering 11

7%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 6

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0