Comparison between the Effectiveness of Rotary and Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review

15Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: To develop a scientifically current and evidence based protocol on the efficacy of rotary and hand root canal instrumentation in primary teeth. Materials and methods: Previous randomized control trials were used for the current review. Hand search and online search engines of PUBMED and Google Scholar were used to search English language articles with human subjects published up to December 2016. Results: After screening of the abstracts and articles, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria a total of 13 articles were included in the systematic review. Conclusion: Rotary instrumentation shows equivalent cleaning efficiency than hand files depending on the system of instrumentation and techniques used. However, use of rotary in primary teeth leads to improved shaping of canals providing better quality of treatment in less time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panchal, V., Jeevanandan, G., & Erulappan, S. M. G. (2019, July 1). Comparison between the Effectiveness of Rotary and Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1637

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free