Inhibition of polyamine synthesis alters hair follicle function and fiber composition

47Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The activities of ornithine decarboxylase and S-adenosylnethionine decarboxylase, two of the enzymes involved in the synthesis of the polyamines, were found to be high in follicle-rich homogenates of sheep skin, and to be responsive to the nutrition of the animal. Systemic provision of the inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, α-difluoromethylornithine, markedly altered the length, diameter, and composition of the fiber, the last being accompanied by an increase in the proportion of the fiber occupied by paracortical cells and an increase in the level of mRNA encoding a cysteine-rich family of keratin proteins. The growth of wool follicles cultured in media containing α-difluoromethylornithine was not inhibited, even at high concentrations, In contrast, low concentrations of methylglyoxal (bis)guanylhydrazone, the inhibitor of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, completely inhibited fiber growth in cultured follicles, Addition of spermidine to the media overcame this inhibition but spermine had no effect, Further evidence that spermine is not required for normal follicle function was provided by incubating follicles with the specific inhibitor of spermine synthase, n-butyl-1,3-diaminopropane. This inhibitor, even at high concentrations, had no effect on fiber growth in vitro. Spermidine partially overcame the growth depression that occurred in follicles cultured in methionine-deficient media, suggesting that part of the requirement for methionine is for spermidine synthesis in the follicle. These investigations provide strong evidence that the polyamines in general, and spermidine in particular, play a major role in hair growth.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hynd, P. I., & Nancarrow, M. J. (1996). Inhibition of polyamine synthesis alters hair follicle function and fiber composition. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 106(2), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12340634

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free