Does CEO duality is really matter? Evidence from an emerging market

17Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The relationship between board leadership, firm financial performance and agency costs is examined on behalf of a sample of multinational company subsidiaries (MNCs) and local public companies (LPCs) in Sri Lanka. Five years of data for 86 MNC subsidiaries and 113 LPCs, are collected and observations are analysed using a dynamic panel GMM estimation. This study provides empirical support for stewardship theory and contingency theory when firms are multinational subsidiaries. Moreover, findings support agency theory when firms are local public companies. Finally, this study indicates that there is no optimal board leadership structure. Hence, when companies commence their exploration of corporate governance practices, firms need to recognised that firm characteristics and contingency perspective boost the impact of board leadership structure on corporate financial performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hewa Wellalage, N., & Locke, S. (2011). Does CEO duality is really matter? Evidence from an emerging market. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8(4 A), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i4p7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free