Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?

  • Rodrigues A
  • Gutierres M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

© 2017 Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure of paramount relevance that restores a substantial degree of function in arthritic knees. Increased consideration has been given to the influence of limb alignment on longevity after TKA, as errors in component placement can be associated with inferior function and compromised long‐term performance. Consequently, numerous studies comparing patient‐specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instruments (SI) have been published. Patient‐specific approaches use preoperative imaging to create specific materials for each patient's anatomy and were designed to achieve a higher rate of success in TKA, causing the entire procedure to be more efficient and cost‐effective. However, it is not clear to what degree these studies support the potential advantages of PSI. Thus, the present study aimed to review the current evidence comparing PSI to SI, concerning alignment, cost‐effectiveness, and postoperative functional evaluation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodrigues, A. S. T., & Gutierres, M. A. P. (2017). Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it? Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), 52(3), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.06.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free