Chemotaxis by mouse macrophage cell lines.

  • Aksamit R
  • Falk W
  • Leonard E
61Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Five mouse macrophage cell lines were tested for chemotaxis and phagocytosis. All 5 cell lines ingested sheep red cells coated with rabbit IgG anti-Forssman antibody and exhibited chemotaxis to endotoxin-activated mouse serum (EAMS) and lymphocyte-derived chemotactic factor. Two cell lines were tested for chemotaxis to f-Met-Leu-Phe and neither responded. Four of the cell lines (RAW264, RAW309CR, PU5-1R, and WR19M.1) exhibited chemotaxis to C5a. These cell lines displayed a 1- to 2-hr lag before migrating toward EAMS, and chemotaxis was dependent upon cell density. When fewer than 10(3) cells were present per mm2 of filter surface, less than 10% of the cells migrated; however, at a density of 5 X 10(3) cells/mm2 50 to 70% of the cells migrated. WEHI-3 differed from the other cell lines in that there was no chemotaxis to C5a, migration to EAMS did not have a detectable lag, and there was no cell density dependence for chemotaxis. Comparison of these chemotactic properties with those reported in the literature for mouse macrophages and monocytes suggests that RAW264, RAW309CR, PU5-1R, and WR19M.1 have properties that are similar to those of mouse resident macrophages, whereas WEHI-3 may have some of the properties of mouse monocytes.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Complement system part I - molecular mechanisms of activation and regulation

1205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complement system part II: Role in immunity

795Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of the anaphylatoxins in health and disease

575Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aksamit, R. R., Falk, W., & Leonard, E. J. (1981). Chemotaxis by mouse macrophage cell lines. The Journal of Immunology, 126(6), 2194–2199. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.126.6.2194

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

77%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

31%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

31%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

23%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free