On byzantine agreement over (2, 3)-uniform Hypergraphs

13Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a Byzantine agreement protocol, a synchronous network of n interconnected processes of which t may be faulty, starts with an initial binary value associated with each process; after exchanging messages, all correct processes must agree on one of the initial values of the non-faulty processes. If the network consists of only unicast channels (i.e. a 2-uniform hypergraph), then Byzantine agreement is possible if and only if n≥ 3t + 1 (Pease et. al. [11]). However, Fitzi and Maurer ([7]) show that if, in addition to all unicast channels, there exists local broadcast among every three processes in the network (i.e. a complete (2,3)-uniform hypergraph), n≥ 2t + 1 is necessary and sufficient for Byzantine agreement. In this paper, we show that optimum tolerance of n≥ 2t + l can be achieved even if a substantial fraction of the local broadcast channels are not available. Specifically, we model the network as a (2,3)-uniform hypergraph H = (P, E), where P denotes the set of n processes and E is a set of 2-tuples and/or 3-tuples of processes (edges or 3-hyperedges), wherein each 3-hyperedge represents a local broadcast among the three processes; we obtain a characterization of the hypergraphs on which Byzantine agreement is possible. Using this characterization, we show that for n = 2t + 1, (2/3t3 +θ(t2)) 3-hyperedges are necessary and sufficient to enable Byzantine agreement. This settles an open problem raised by Fitzi and Maurer in [7]. An efficient protocol is also given whenever Byzantine agreement is possible. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ravikant, D. V. S., Muthuramakrishnan, V., Srikanth, V., Srinathan, K., & Pandu Rangan, C. (2004). On byzantine agreement over (2, 3)-uniform Hypergraphs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3274, 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30186-8_32

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free