The EU AI Act: A pioneering effort to regulate frontier AI?

2Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The emergence of increasingly capable artificial intelligence (AI) systems has raised concerns about the potential extreme risks associated with them. The issue has drawn substantial attention in academic literature and compelled legislators of regulatory frameworks like the European Union AI Act (AIA) to readapt them to the new paradigm. This paper examines whether the European Parliament’s draft of the AIA constitutes an appropriate approach to address the risks derived from frontier models. In particular, we discuss whether the AIA reflects the policy needs diagnosed by recent literature and determine if the requirements falling on providers of foundation models are appropriate, sufficient, and durable. We find that the provisions are generally adequate, but insufficiently defined in some areas and lacking in others. Finally, the AIA is characterized as an evolving framework whose durability will depend on the institutions’ ability to adapt to future progress.

References Powered by Scopus

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

22388Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

1488Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning

556Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Artificial Intelligence Regulation on Labour Market: Comparative Perspectives on the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act in the Indonesian Context

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bas, G., Salinas, C., Tinoco, R., & Sevilla, J. (2024). The EU AI Act: A pioneering effort to regulate frontier AI? Inteligencia Artificial, 27(73), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.4114/intartif.vol27iss73pp55-64

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 3

50%

Social Sciences 2

33%

Engineering 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free