Institutional Review Board (IRB): its role and responsibility in making research ethical

  • Nurunnabi A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This is a review article prepared as a part of the assignment in the educational activity and training on research ethics titled “Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research” arranged by the Bangladesh Bioethics Society (BBS), Dhaka, Bangladesh, in collaboration with the Department of Bioethics of National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA, through video conferencing between September 25 and November 13 of 2013. The search was confined to ‘Google’, ‘HINARI’ and ‘PubMed’ published articles. Besides, some guidelines on roles and responsibilities of Institutional Review Board (IRB) were taken into consideration. Key words used for searching were ‘institutional review board’, ‘ethical review committee’ and ‘ethical research’. A total of 18 journal articles and some guidelines were selected for this writing. The systemic review from the databases revealed some important discussions on research, ethical research, roles and responsibilities of IRB/ERC and its challenges, and national/institutional research strategies. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bioethics.v5i1.18442 Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 2014 Vol.5(1): 5-10

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nurunnabi, A. S. M. (2014). Institutional Review Board (IRB): its role and responsibility in making research ethical. Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics, 5(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.3329/bioethics.v5i1.18442

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free