Inference rules and decision rules

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Basic rules of inference used in classical logic are Modus Ponens (MP) and Modus Tollens (MT). These two reasoning patterns start from some general knowledge about reality, expressed by true implication, " if φ then ψ". Then basing on true premise φ we arrive at true conclusion ψ (MP), or from negation of true conclusion ψ we get negation of true premise φ (MT). In reasoning from data (data mining) we also use rules " if φ then ψ", called decision rules, to express our knowledge about reality, but in this case the meaning of the expression is different. It does not express general knowledge but refers to partial facts. Therefore decision rules are not true or false but probable (possible) only. In this paper we compare inference rules and decision rules in the context of decision networks, proposed by the author as a new approach to analyze reasoning patterns in data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pawlak, Z. (2004). Inference rules and decision rules. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 3070, pp. 102–108). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24844-6_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free