Incidental findings on single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer: the proposed Westmead SPECT/CT incidental findings classification

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of incidental radiological findings detected on SPECT/CT performed as part of pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery and development of a modified classification to workup these lesions. Methods: A retrospective audit was performed of all SPECT/CT performed in combination with lymphoscintigrams in breast cancer patients presenting with clinically node negative axillae and operated on by breast surgeons at the Westmead Breast Cancer Institute over a 12-month period. Results: Four hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study. In 149 patients (35.6%), there was a total of 205 incidental findings. The most common findings were, pulmonary abnormalities (38.5%), abdominal findings (27.8%), thyroid nodules (14.6%), cardiac abnormalities (10.7%) and others (8.3%). Using our proposed Westmead SPECT/CT incidental findings (WSIF) classification, 7.8% were known, 17.6% were major findings, 48.3% were minor findings, 15.1% were minimal findings and 11.2% were equivocal findings. 17.6% (n = 36) underwent further workup and investigation and 3.4% of patients (n = 5) required therapeutic intervention, including chemotherapy for primary lung cancer(n = 1) and surgeries (thoracotomy, n = 1; thyroidectomy, n = 2; colonoscopy, n = 1). 93.8% (n = 393) had at least one SLN mapped, most commonly located in Level 1 of the axilla. Conclusion: The incidental findings on SPECT/CT in combination with lymphoscintigraphy is within the range of previous studies (27.3–59.5%). A small proportion of patients required significant major interventions (3.4%). We propose that all incidental findings should be assessed according to our WSIF classification to aid in triaging need for further investigation and management.

References Powered by Scopus

Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening

8920Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: From the Fleischner Society 2017

1837Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Two decades of SPECT/CT – the coming of age of a technology: An updated review of literature evidence

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Progress in application of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging in clinical practice

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnosis of SPECT/CT bone imaging combined with two serum examinations in patients with bone metastases from pulmonary cancer

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quah, G. S., French, J. R., Gordon, D. J., Juvarkar, L. Y., Meybodi, F., Hsu, J., & Elder, E. (2022). Incidental findings on single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer: the proposed Westmead SPECT/CT incidental findings classification. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 92(6), 1434–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17659

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Materials Science 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0