Remedial principles and meaningful engagement in education rights disputes

8Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article evaluates the meaningful engagement doctrine in the education rights jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court in the light of a set of normative principles developed by Susan Sturm for evaluating participatory public law remedies. It commences by identifying four principles for evaluating participatory remedies appropriate to South African constitutional law and jurisprudence. Thereafter the relevant jurisprudence is analysed and evaluated in the light of these principles. The article concludes by making proposals for the development of meaningful engagement as a participatory remedy in educational rights disputes. These proposals seek to ensure a better alignment between the meaningful engagement remedy and the four remedial principles identified.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liebenberg, S. (2016). Remedial principles and meaningful engagement in education rights disputes. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 19. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a739

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free