We consider the logical representation of obligations on stative expressions such as The yard must be clean in the context of legal contract formation, execution, and monitoring (cf. Wyner ([28])). In a contract, the expression may understood as an obligation to maintain a property. We use a Deontic Action Logic to represent obligations over the course of time (Khosla and Maibaum ([13]) and Meyer ([17])). Our analysis is in contrast to d'Altan, Meyer, and Wieringa ([6]), who reduce deontic operators to an Alethic Logic plus a violation proposition (Anderson and Moore ([1])), which has no temporal component. In addition, they use a Deontic Action Logic to represent obligations on actions. We claim the Alethic component of the logic is redundant for the purposes of representing obligations on stative expressions in a contract. In the course of the analysis, we introduce polynormativity, which contrasts with the binormativity of standard DAL or alethic logic plus a violation proposition. We discuss the advantages of polynormativity in reasoning from violations and fulfillments.
CITATION STYLE
Wyner, A. Z. (2004). Maintaining obligations on stative expressions in a deontic action logic. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 3065, pp. 258–274). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25927-5_17
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.