Geometry-Based versus Small-Molecule Tracking Method for Tunnel Identification: Benefits and Pitfalls

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Different methods for tunnel identification, geometry-based and small-molecule tracking approaches, were compared to provide their benefits and pitfalls. Results obtained for both crystal structures and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were analyzed to investigate if a more computationally demanding method would be beneficial. Careful examination of the results is essential for the low-diameter tunnel description, and assessment of the tunnel functionality based only on their geometrical parameters is challenging. We showed that the small-molecule tracking approach can provide a detailed description of the system; however, it can also be the most computationally demanding.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitusińska, K., Bzówka, M., Magdziarz, T., & Góra, A. (2022). Geometry-Based versus Small-Molecule Tracking Method for Tunnel Identification: Benefits and Pitfalls. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 62(24), 6803–6811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00985

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free