Factors influencing gas well productivity in fractured tight sandstone reservoir

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There are many factors which influence the absolute open flow potential (AOFP) of gas well. One of them is the angle between maximum principal stress direction and natural fracture strike in gas reservoir. In order to find out how the angle influences the AOFP of gas well. A lot of data related to gas well productivity of 14 wells located in gas reservoir T were collected and collated. Influential intensity of each factor on the AOFP before and after reservoir modification was investigated through grey relation analysis method. Results indicated that the AOFP of gas well before and after reservoir modification was governed by 10 factors. The five central factors influencing the initial AOFP are natural fracture density, porosity, permeability, elevation of geological top surface, and gas saturation, respectively. The five central factors influencing the AOFP of hydraulically fractured gas well are porosity, gas saturation, elevation of geological top surface, minimum principal stress, and permeability, respectively. Angle between maximum principal stress direction and natural fracture strike was not the central factor influencing gas well productivity. Reservoir modification can greatly improve gas well productivity in fractured tight sandstone reservoir. Natural fracture density was the strongest influencing factor of the initial AOFP. Minimum principal stress was one of the central factors influencing the AOFP of hydraulically fractured gas well. Research results can be used to guide well deployment and gas productivity investment projects of fractured tight sandstone reservoir.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, B., Zhang, H., Wang, H., & Wang, Z. (2022). Factors influencing gas well productivity in fractured tight sandstone reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 12(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01379-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free