Mini-sternotomy vs right anterior thoracotomy for aortic valve replacement

24Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: While minimally invasive techniques for aortic valve replacement (AVR) have been shown to be safe, limited data exist comparing the varying approaches. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between two minimally invasive approaches for AVR: mini-sternotomy (MS) and right anterior thoracotomy (RAT). Materials and Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID was conducted for the period 1990-2019. Nine observational studies (n = 2926 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Results: There was no difference in operative mortality between MS and RAT (odds ratio [OR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.85; P =.709). Meta-analyses favored MS over RAT in reoperation for bleeding (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.28-0.63; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yousuf Salmasi, M., Hamilton, H., Rahman, I., Chien, L., Rival, P., Benedetto, U., … Vohra, H. A. (2020, July 1). Mini-sternotomy vs right anterior thoracotomy for aortic valve replacement. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14607

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free