Determinants of measured olfactory sensitivity

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ten participants sought to detect four odorants: benzaldehyde, pyridine, and two alcohols, n-butyl and n-amyl alcohol, that smelled similar to each other. These were presented repeatedly on 3 successive days. The sequence of testing during a session made it possible to determine whether experience with one odorant would specifically facilitate the detectability of a similar-smelling odorant and whether any such facilitation would restrict itself to the nostril through which the experience was gained. Neither of these possibilities occurred. Instead, measured sensitivity increased rather uniformly both within and across days. Net gain from beginning to end exceeded an order of magnitude. Averaging across sessions gave a picture of smaller than usual individual differences, under 20 to 1, attributable mainly to general rather than odorant-specific differences in sensitivity. The results indicate that thresholds gathered in customary brief testing will underestimate olfactory sensitivity and overestimate individual differences. Incorporation of a reference odorant into threshold experiments should increase comparability among studies. © 1986 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rabin, M. D., & Cain, W. S. (1986). Determinants of measured olfactory sensitivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 39(4), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204936

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free