Physical degradation of soils favors water erosion. Because of its intensity, conventional tillage usually acellerates the soil erosion process. Therefore, no-tillage is considered a soil conservation management system, because it preserves crop residues on soil surface. However, no-tillage may also increase bulk density and decrease surface soil total porosity. This study investigates the effects of soil management on a Haplumbrept, from May 1995 to November 1999, in the region of Lages, SC, Brazil. Three soil tillage treatments were used: conventional tillage (plowing plus disking), no-tillage and natural pasture. The crop sequences used were maize and vetch in the no-tillage system, and maize and fallow in the conventional tillage system. -Soil strength and mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (MWD) were evaluated for soil layers of 0-2.5 cm, 2.5-5.0 cm, 5.0-10.0 cm and 10.0-15.0 cm. Soil water intake rate was also evaluated. The MWD did not differ betwen treatments for the 0-2.5 cm layer; in the other layers the soil presented higher values for the natural pasture and no-tillage treatments. Soil strength was higher for the no-tillage treatment in the 0-2.5 cm layer. The water intake rate was higher in the soil of the conventional tillage as compared to other management treatments.
CITATION STYLE
Bertol, I., Beutler, J. F., Leite, D., & Batistela, O. (2001). Propriedades físicas de um cambissolo húmico afetadas pelo tipo de manejo do solo. Scientia Agricola, 58(3), 555–560. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162001000300018
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.