Cross-Sectional & Longitudinal Associations between Light-Intensity Physical Activity & Physical Function Among Cancer Survivors

  • C B
  • M M
  • R D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: While moderate-vigorous intensity physical activities (MVPA) confer the greatest health benefits, evidence suggests that light-intensity activities are also beneficial, particularly for older adults and individuals with moderate-severe comorbidities. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between light-intensity physical activity and physical function were examined in elderly cancer survivors, who are at increased risk for age- and treatment related comorbidities, including accelerated functional decline. Methods: The analysis included 641 breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors (54% female) aged 65 and older who participated in a 1-year, home-based diet and exercise intervention designed to reduce the rate of physical function decline. Pre- and post-intervention physical activity and function were assessed via the CHAMPS questionnaire, the SF-36 physical function subscale (PFS) and the Late Life Function and Disability Index basic and advanced lower-extremity function (LEF) subscales. ANCOVA was used to compare means of physical function across levels of PA intensity (low-light (LLPA): 1.0-2.0 METs; high-light (HLPA): 2.1-2.9 METs; MVPA: ≥3.0 METs). Results: After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, symptoms, and MVPA, increasing tertiles of baseline light-intensity activity were associated with higher scores for all 3 measures of baseline physical function (all p-values <0.005). Associations were stronger for HLPA than for LLPA. Compared with survivors who decreased or remained stable in MVPA and HLPA at the post-intervention follow-up, those who increased in HLPA, but not MVPA, reported higher physical function scores (LSMeans (95% CI): SF-36 PFS: −5.58 (−7.96, −3.20) vs. −2.54 (−5.83, 0.75), p = 0.14; basic LEF: -2.00 (−3.45, −0.55) vs. 0.28 (−1.72, 2.28), p = 0.07; advanced LEF: −2.58 (−4.00, −1.15) vs. 0.44 (-1.52, 2.40), p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that increasing light-intensity activities, especially HLPA, may be a viable approach to reducing the rate of physical function decline in individuals who are unable or reluctant to initiate or maintain adequate levels of moderate-intensity activities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

C, B., M, M., R, D., R, S., D, S., H, C., & W, D.-W. (2013). Cross-Sectional & Longitudinal Associations between Light-Intensity Physical Activity & Physical Function Among Cancer Survivors. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 22(3), 475–476. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free