Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: A systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors

385Citations
Citations of this article
224Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials are commonly done without blinded outcome assessors despite the risk of bias. We wanted to evaluate the effect of nonblinded outcome assessment on estimated effects in randomized clinical trials with outcomes that involved subjective measurement scales. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessment of the same measurement scale outcome. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, HighWire Press and Google Scholar for relevant studies. Two investigators agreed on the inclusion of trials and the outcome scale. For each trial, we calculated the difference in effect size (i.e., standardized mean difference between nonblinded and blinded assessments). A difference in effect size of less than 0 suggested that nonblinded assessors generated more optimistic estimates of effect. We pooled the differences in effect size using inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis and used metaregression to identify potential reasons for variation. Results: We included 24 trials in our review. The main meta-analysis included 16 trials (involving 2854 patients) with subjective outcomes. The estimated treatment effect was more beneficial when based on nonblinded assessors (pooled difference in effect size -0.23 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.40 to -0.06]). In relative terms, nonblinded assessors exaggerated the pooled effect size by 68% (95% CI 14% to 230%). Heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 46%, p = 0.02) and unexplained by metaregression. Interpretation: We provide empirical evidence for observer bias in randomized clinical trials with subjective measurement scale outcomes. A failure to blind assessors of outcomes in such trials results in a high risk of substantial bias. © 2013 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.

References Powered by Scopus

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

32749Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series

18002Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial

1282Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2182Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - A practical guide with flowcharts

1712Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Compression stockings to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome: A randomised placebo-controlled trial

470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hróbjartsson, A., Thomsen, A. S. S., Emanuelsson, F., Tendal, B., Hilden, J., Boutron, I., … Brorson, S. (2013). Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: A systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors. CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 185(4). https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.120744

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 77

68%

Researcher 15

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 73

64%

Nursing and Health Professions 23

20%

Psychology 12

11%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 6

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 10

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free