Stochastic Model of Gap Junctions Exhibiting Rectification and Multiple Closed States of Slow Gates

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Gap-junction (GJ) channels formed from connexin (Cx) proteins provide direct pathways for electrical and metabolic cell-cell communication. Earlier, we developed a stochastic 16-state model (S16SM) of voltage gating of the GJ channel containing two pairs of fast and slow gates, each operating between open (o) and closed (c) states. However, experimental data suggest that gates may in fact contain two or more closed states. We developed a model in which the slow gate operates according to a linear reaction scheme, o→c1→c2, where c1 and c2 are initial-closed and deep-closed states that both close the channel fully, whereas the fast gate operates between the open state and the closed state and exhibits a residual conductance. Thus, we developed a stochastic 36-state model (S36SM) of GJ channel gating that is sensitive to transjunctional voltage (Vj). To accelerate simulation and eliminate noise in simulated junctional conductance (gj) records, we transformed an S36SM into a Markov chain 36-state model (MC36SM) of GJ channel gating. This model provides an explanation for well-established experimental data, such as delayed gj recovery after Vj gating, hysteresis of gj-Vj dependence, and the low ratio of functional channels to the total number of GJ channels clustered in junctional plaques, and it has the potential to describe chemically mediated gating, which cannot be reflected using an S16SM. The MC36SM, when combined with global optimization algorithms, can be used for automated estimation of gating parameters including probabilities of c1→c2 transitions from experimental gj-time and gj-Vj dependencies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Snipas, M., Kraujalis, T., Paulauskas, N., MacIunas, K., & Bukauskas, F. F. (2016). Stochastic Model of Gap Junctions Exhibiting Rectification and Multiple Closed States of Slow Gates. Biophysical Journal, 110(6), 1322–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.01.035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free