Hemodiafiltration: Clinical evidence and remaining questions

79Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Currently, about two-thirds of hemodialysis patients worldwide are treated with high-flux membranes. This is most likely based on the assumption that the extended solute clearance that can be obtained with more open membranes will contribute to improved clinical outcome. To have full advantage of convective solute removal, hemodiafiltration offers a superior modality as compared to both low-flux and high-flux hemodialysis. However, this technique is offered to only a minority of patients. In this review, we summarize the available clinical evidence on hemodiafiltration and define still remaining questions. © 2010 International Society of Nephrology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blankestijn, P. J., Ledebo, I., & Canaud, B. (2010, April). Hemodiafiltration: Clinical evidence and remaining questions. Kidney International. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2009.541

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free