Exploiting network topology for large-scale inference of nonlinear reaction models

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The development of chemical reaction models aids understanding and prediction in areas ranging from biology to electrochemistry and combustion. A systematic approach to building reaction network models uses observational data not only to estimate unknown parameters but also to learn model structure. Bayesian inference provides a natural approach to this data-driven construction of models. Yet traditional Bayesian model inference methodologies that numerically evaluate the evidence for each model are often infeasible for nonlinear reaction network inference, as the number of plausible models can be combinatorially large. Alternative approaches based on model-space sampling can enable large-scale network inference, but their realization presents many challenges. In this paper, we present new computational methods that make large-scale nonlinear network inference tractable. First, we exploit the topology of networks describing potential interactions among chemical species to design improved 'between-model' proposals for reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Second, we introduce a sensitivity-based determination of move types which, when combined with network-aware proposals, yields significant additional gains in sampling performance. These algorithms are demonstrated on inference problems drawn from systems biology, with nonlinear differential equation models of species interactions.

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

15Citations
27Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Galagali, N., & Marzouk, Y. M. (2019). Exploiting network topology for large-scale inference of nonlinear reaction models. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 16(152). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0766

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Researcher 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

29%

Mathematics 2

29%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

29%

Energy 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0