The cluster hypothesis revisited

136Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A new means of evaluating the cluster hypothesis is introduced and the results of such an evaluation are presented for four collections. The results of retrieval experiments comparing a sequential search, a cluster-based search, and a search of the clustered collection in which individual documents are scored against the query are also presented. These results indicate that while the absolute performance of a search on a particular collection is dependent on the pairwise similarity of the relevant documents, the relative effectiveness of clustered retrieval versus sequential retrieval is independent of this factor. However, retrieval of entire clusters in response to a query usually results in a poorer performance than retrieval of individual documents from clusters.

References Powered by Scopus

Extended Boolean Information Retrieval

664Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The use of hierarchic clustering in information retrieval

374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A model of cluster searching based on classification

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Indexing by latent semantic analysis

9562Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developments in automatic text retrieval

470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using latent semantic analysis to improve access to textual information

419Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Voorhees, E. M. (1985). The cluster hypothesis revisited. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1985 (pp. 188–196). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/253495.253524

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

62%

Researcher 11

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 60

95%

Social Sciences 1

2%

Physics and Astronomy 1

2%

Engineering 1

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free