Using time-dependent models to investigate body condition and growth rate of the giant gartersnake

14Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Identifying links between phenotypic attributes and fitness is a primary goal of reproductive ecology. Differences in within-year patterns of body condition between sexes of gartersnakes in relation to reproduction and growth are not fully understood. We conducted an 11-year field study of body condition and growth rate of the giant gartersnake Thamnophis gigas across 13 study areas in the Central Valley of California, USA. We developed a priori mixed effects models of body condition index (BCI), which included covariates of time, sex and snout-vent length and reported the best-approximating models using an information theoretic approach. Also, we developed models of growth rate index (GRI) using covariates of sex and periods based on reproductive behavior. The largest difference in BCI between sexes, as predicted by a non-linear (cubic) time model, occurred during the mating period when female body condition (0.014±0.001 se) was substantially greater than males (-0.027±0.002 se). Males likely allocated energy to search for mates, while females likely stored energy for embryonic development. We also provided evidence that males use more body energy reserves than females during hibernation, perhaps because of different body temperatures between sexes. We found GRI of male snakes was substantially lower during the mating period than during a non-mating period, which indicated that a trade-off existed between searching for mates and growth. These findings contribute to our understanding of snake ecology in a Mediterranean climate. © 2009 The Zoological Society of London.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coates, P. S., Wylie, G. D., Halstead, B. J., & Casazza, M. L. (2009). Using time-dependent models to investigate body condition and growth rate of the giant gartersnake. Journal of Zoology, 279(3), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00617.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free