Objective: Observe the agreement between IOL Master 500 and Pentacam AXL and describe the averages. Methods: We analyzed 35 medical records, totaling 61 eyes. All patients underwent biometric evaluation on both devices from August 2018 to August 2019. The data collected were: age, gender, anterior chamber depth, axial length, K1, K2, biometrics and IOL target. Results: The averages of the variables analyzed between the optical biometric devices in question had a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Linear regression showed no influence of any anterior chamber variables on the difference in biometrics and target values between the devices. Conclusion: There was no statistical agreement between the devices for the analyzed variables. Therefore, the interchange of Pentacam AXL with IOL Master 500 should be avoided.
CITATION STYLE
Rodrigues, F. W., de Freitas, M. P. B., de Oliveira, J. N., da Silva, R. E., Chater, S. B., & Filho, J. C. (2020). Analysis of biometric data generated by interferometry compared with Scheimpflug: Analise dos dados biométricos gerados por interferometria comparada com Scheimpflug. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia, 79(5), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7280.20200062
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.