Why bigger isn’t always better: Caring for patients in smaller, rural and remote hospitals

Abstract

One of the current obsessions of the NHS is with economies of scale-the notion that healthcare would be safer, faster, cheaper and more efficient if services were provided by larger teams in bigger hospitals or across ever-enlarging networks of organisations. This could be seen as an extension, albeit in a mutated form, of the decades-long drive towards centralisation and specialisation of hospital services. 1,2 To these ends, over half of all hospitals in England have been closed or merged in the last 20 years, while one of the purposes of sustainability and transformation partnerships (STPs) is to create unprecedented economies of scale at regional level across every type of NHS organisation. 2-4 One of the consequences of this trend has been to make the smaller hospital seem a near irrelevance in the NHS landscape. Yet smaller hospitals provide care to nearly half the population of England in communities which are frequently rural and/or remote, are more deprived and with a patient cohort that is older and more comorbid than average. 5 These hospitals arguably face greater challenges than their larger, more urban counterparts. They are more likely to suffer from workforce shortages, a more constrained financial environment and frequently not commissioned to provide the highly specialist services that the public increasingly expects. 5,6 Many of them are plagued by the existential threat of closure, which makes planning and recruitment an even more difficult task. Yet the game for smaller hospitals is not completely over just yet. There is an increasing awareness of their importance internationally, especially in widely geographically dispersed countries such as the USA, Canada and Australia. 7 In England, The NHS Long Term Plan acknowledged the problems of smaller acute hospitals, including the fact that many 'national standards and policies [are] not appropriately tailored to meet their needs', and pledged to work with trusts on new operating models and developing better links with other parts of local systems. 8 This has been extended to the consideration of specific needs of smaller, rural and remote hospitals with regard to workforce planning and postgraduate education as part of the forthcoming NHS People Plan. For some smaller hospitals, their need is urgent and these structural changes cannot come fast enough. In this issue of the Future Healthcare Journal , we brought together some of the key thinkers in the UK and internationally on the problems of smaller hospitals. The notion that 'bigger is better' is challenged and the evidence outlining the critical importance of smaller hospitals in providing high-quality, safe care to their local population is reviewed. In terms of original research, John Browne presents the overall findings of the reconfiguration of acute and emergency services in the Republic of Ireland, while Kevin Fox and colleagues look at the benefits of working in rural and remote settings. 9,10 Namita Kumar and Adrian Brooke provide an overview of the forthcoming changes to postgraduate training in smaller hospitals, while Rose Singleton gives her personal perspective of training in north Cumbria. 11,12 Richard Kerr and Chris Thorpe give their perspectives on the future provision of surgery and intensive care medicine, respectively, in smaller hospitals. 13,14 Dealing with the here and now, Ed Smith recounts the challenges and outcomes of revamping acute services in a smaller hospital under pressure. 15 Rounding out the issue, Richard Fleet tells of his vision for a new model of smaller hospital, one that is a 'living laboratory' for innovative research and high-quality medical care. 16