Wavelength generalization and discrimination in the pigeon

43Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This three-part study describes wavelength generalization gradients around a series of training wavelengths ranging from 480 to 645 om. Luminance was controlled for the pigeon's spectral sensitivity. The response measure was probability of keypecking during a 2-sec stimulus presentation. Both an extinction procedure, where stimulus wavelengths occurred in 15-nm steps, and a maintained discrimination procedure, where step size was 2 to 4 nm, were used to obtain gradients. During a portion of the maintained discrimination procedure, new luminances were introduced, so that the effect of luminance level on gradient slope could be examined. Comparison of the resulting functions across training wavelengths revealed: (1) consistent differences in gradient slope in different spectral regions and (2) an increase in slope with luminance increase. The findings are related to recent electroretinographic wavelength contrast data and to psychophysical measures of wavelength discriminability. © 1972 Psychonomic Society.

References Powered by Scopus

AUTO‐SHAPING OF THE PIGEON'S KEY‐PECK

1174Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An opponent-process theory of color vision

693Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discriminability and stimulus generalization

364Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A century of generalization

378Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

THE LEGACY OF GUTTMAN AND KALISH (1956): 25 YEARS OF RESEARCH ON STIMULUS GENERALIZATION

228Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stimulus control and inhibitory processes

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blough, P. M. (1972). Wavelength generalization and discrimination in the pigeon. Perception & Psychophysics, 12(4), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207219

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Researcher 5

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 10

63%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

25%

Environmental Science 1

6%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free