Clinical outcome of redo operation on aortic root

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: With the increasing use of biologic conduits or bioprosthetic valve, the number of patients who require redo operation on aortic root increased. Methods: In the past 22 years, 14 patients underwent redo operation on aortic root. The mean age was 61.9 ± 14.8 years. Previous operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 4), aortic root replacement with subcoronary technique (n = 3) and Bentall operation (n = 7). The operation interval was 5.4 ± 6.4 years. Indication for redo operation included structural valve deterioration (n = 6), prosthetic valve endocarditis (n = 4), perivalvular leakage (n = 2), dilatation of sinus of Valsalva (n = 1) and dehiscence of proximal anastomosis line (n = 1). Mean follow-up period was 5.3 ± 5.2 years. Results: Present operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 5) and Bentall operation (n = 9). There was one in-hospital death (7.1 %) caused by arrhythmia. Postoperative complications included implantation of permanent pacemaker (n = 3), arrhythmia (n = 2) and re-intubation (n = 1). The 5-year survival was 92.9 ± 6.9 %. Freedom from redo aortic operation at 5 years was 100 %. Conclusion: Redo operation on aortic root can be performed with acceptable in-hospital mortality and good late survival. © 2013 The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fukunaga, N., Koyama, T., Konishi, Y., Murashita, T., Kanemitsu, H., & Okada, Y. (2014). Clinical outcome of redo operation on aortic root. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 62(4), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0332-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free