Intra-Areolar Pexy: The "Compass Rose" Suture Technique for Small and Moderate Areola Herniation

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Common methods for addressing minor tuberous breast (type 0; normal mammary base breast with isolated areolar herniation) do not solve the underlying pathology and may leave an unsightly scar. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of a simple, scarless method based on a novel "compass rose" technique, which addresses the etiology of minor tuberous breast and other cases desiring small areolar diameter reductions. Methods: The technique uses 3 layers of suturing, 1 in a compass pattern and 2 in round block. Retrospective data are provided for 77 consecutive women (141 breasts) undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation surgery and requiring unilateral or bilateral type 0 tuberous breast correction (n = 22) or areolar width reduction ≤ 15 mm (n = 55). Results: Baseline mean age and body mass index were 29.7 ± 6.0 years and 19.4 ± 1.5 kg/m2, respectively. Patients were followed up for a mean of 27.2 ± 19.5 months. In tuberous breast, mean Northwood Index decreased from 0.55 ± 0.06 at baseline to 0.36 ± 0.02 at ≥ 6 months post surgery, indicating minimal residual deformity. In areolar width reductions without tuberosity, mean width decreases of 11.3 ± 1.8 mm (20.0%) were achieved. Patient satisfaction was high with regard to lack of scarring, stability of the result, and overall breast attractiveness. Eight complications were recorded (n = 2 superficial hematoma; n = 3 hypersensibility; n = 2 knot palpability; n = 1 recurrence); all were resolved. Conclusions: The method is effective and safe, and may be applicable across patients with type 0 tuberous breast or desiring small areolar diameter reductions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ionescu, R., Dima, D., & Antohi, N. (2019). Intra-Areolar Pexy: The “Compass Rose” Suture Technique for Small and Moderate Areola Herniation. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 39(4), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free