TIME‐ALLOCATION MATCHING BETWEEN PUNISHING SITUATIONS 1

  • Deluty M
  • Church R
11Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the presence and absence of white noise, response‐independent aversive events were delivered to rats according to several variable‐time electric‐shock schedules. The animals could switch from the noise component to the no‐noise component and vice versa by making a single lever‐press response. If the schedule in one component was not in operation when the animal was in the other component, the proportion of time allocated to one component equalled or matched the proportion of obtained punishers in the other component. If both schedules were always in operation, minimizing tended to occur: the animals allocated almost all of their time to the component having the lower shock rate. An analysis of these results, in terms of the expected time until an aversive event, is presented.

References Powered by Scopus

ON THE LAW OF EFFECT

1957Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE STRENGTH OF RESPONSE AS A FUNCTION OF FREQUENCY OF REINFORCEMENT

1556Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CHOICE AS TIME ALLOCATION

546Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

MATCHING, UNDERMATCHING, AND OVERMATCHING IN STUDIES OF CHOICE

519Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

REINFORCEMENT AND PUNISHMENT EFFECTS IN CONCURRENT SCHEDULES: A TEST OF TWO MODELS

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Punishment in human choice: Direct or competitive suppression?

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deluty, M. Z., & Church, R. M. (1978). TIME‐ALLOCATION MATCHING BETWEEN PUNISHING SITUATIONS 1. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1978.29-191

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

50%

Researcher 6

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 14

74%

Neuroscience 3

16%

Computer Science 1

5%

Social Sciences 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free