Society’s attitudes towards impact of immigration: case of EU countries

  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the most pressing problems nowadays attracting attention of EU citizens is the integration of immigrants. During the recent period immigration flows to the EU, especially external, were growing considerably – the number of international immigrants in the EU has increased by 57.5 percent over 2000 – 2015. One of the factors leading to successful integration of immigrants is attitudes towards them regarding their impact on countries’ socio-economic, cultural or other transformation. Empirical studies show that immigration can lead to both positive and negative effects on countries’ demography, economy, culture and criminogenic situation depending on the immigrants’ education, age, gender and other characteristics. Nevertheless, even if immigration leads to a positive transformation of the country, society’s attitude towards immigration can be negative and this can complicate the process of integration. For this reason, it is important to investigate not only the effects of immigration on countries’ demography, economy, culture and other areas, but also to investigate society’s attitudes towards benefits and losses of immigration. We employed binary logistic regression to analyse the EU society’s attitudes towards consequences of immigration. The results show that public attitudes toward consequences of immigration are largely negative, especially towards impact on criminogenic situation and this does not match actual impact empirically researched by other authors and presented in the literature review.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butkus, M., Maciulyte-Sniukiene, A., … Davidaviciene, V. (2018). Society’s attitudes towards impact of immigration: case of EU countries. Marketing and Management of Innovations, (1), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.1-26

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

60%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

20%

Computer Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0