Predicted cardiovascular mortality and reported cardiovascular morbidity in testicular cancer survivors

35Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We examined if testicular cancer (TC) treatment is associated with any risk for cardiovascular morbidity or predicted mortality according to the SCORE model, in which a 10-year future risk of ≥5% for developing a fatal cardiovascular event qualify for high-risk status. One thousand one hundred thirty-four TC survivors treated 1980-1994 participated in this study (1998-2002). Patients were categorised in four treatment groups: surgery (n∈=∈225), radiotherapy (n∈=∈445), and two chemotherapy groups: cumulative cisplatin dose ≤850 mg (n∈=∈375) and >850 mg (cis>850, n∈=∈89). Patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes or SCORE ≥5% constituted a high-risk group, and those with SCORE >1% an intermediate/high risk group. Age-adjusted mean SCORE was 0.93% for the surgery group. In comparison, chemotherapy treated patients had significantly higher SCORE (1.07%, p∈=∈0.01). Only 15% of patients were scored to be at high-risk, while 53% qualified for the intermediate/high risk group. Patients in the cis>850 group had increased odds for having intermediate/high risk, compared with the surgery group (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3-8.7). Only 23 cardiovascular events had occurred since the testicular cancer diagnosis. The SCORE model indicates that patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy have a significantly increased future risk of a fatal cardiovascular event. TC survivors should be followed regularly with respect to cardiovascular risk profile beyond the routine 10-year clinical follow-up. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haugnes, H. S., Aass, N., Fosså, S. D., Dahl, O., Klepp, O., Wist, E. A., … Bremnes, R. M. (2008). Predicted cardiovascular mortality and reported cardiovascular morbidity in testicular cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2(3), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-008-0054-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free