Design and Methods of the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry

44Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background. Beneficial aspects of solid organ transplantation, which encompass survival benefit, improved quality of life, and cost efficacy, have been clearly demonstrated. However, regional and ethnic differences require further studies to identify prognostic factors and transplant outcomes against various backgrounds. After previous efforts of a nationwide, retrospective study on the kidney transplant outcomes in Korea, a new prospective-designed version of the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) was launched in 2014. Methods. Cohorts of kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas transplantation were developed. Data on demographics, comorbid conditions, laboratory tests, including tissue typing and panel reactive antibody tests, immunosuppressive regimen followed, concentration and dosage of immunosuppressants, allograft rejection type, infectious events, cardiovascular outcomes, malignancies, donor comorbidity, and outcomes of living donors are collected. Longitudinal data collection is based on a regular annual interval, and blood samples are collected before organ transplantation and again at 1 and 3 years posttransplantation. To enhance data quality, a predefined data verification system operates on a Web-based database, and transplant center users receive regular education about updates. Data are cleansed thrice a year, and feedback given to centers about outlier values and missing data. Annual auditing is conducted. Results. Currently, 59 centers are participating in KOTRY. The estimated annual enrollment is more than 2000 cases. Conclusions. KOTRY, as a systematic Korean transplant cohort, is expected to provide important information on Asian organ transplantation. The processes used to establish KOTRY provide a good model for launching new nationwide transplant cohort studies.

References Powered by Scopus

A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

11374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

5404Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant

4514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Systematic Review of Opt-out Versus Opt-in Consent on Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation (2006–2016)

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outcomes after liver transplantation in korea: Incidence and risk factors from korean transplantation registry

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical impact of early post-transplant infection in older kidney transplant recipients: the Korean organ transplantation registry study

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, J., Jeong, J. C., Lee, J., Kim, Y. H., Paik, H. C., Kim, J. J., … Ahn, C. (2017). Design and Methods of the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry. Transplantation Direct, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000678

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2305101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

20%

Researcher 4

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

50%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 4

25%

Social Sciences 2

13%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0