The heavenly calculus and socially responsible business conduct: An explorative study among executives

6Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper we present a theoretical economic model, describing the influence of eschatological beliefs of executives on their socially responsible business conduct. The core hypothesis is that the belief that one's eternal destination depends on how one behaves in business will provide an incentive to socially responsible business conduct. We confront the model with explorative empirical data, collected by in-depth interviews with and questionnaires among twenty Dutch executives. The data provide weak indications that eschatological beliefs influence the executives' socially responsible business conduct. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007.

References Powered by Scopus

Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis

4951Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The corporate social performance-financial performance link

4470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?

2558Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Religiosity, CSR Attitudes, and CSR Behavior: An Empirical Study of Executives’ Religiosity and CSR

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The human experience of ethics: a review of a decade of qualitative ethical decision-making research

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Corporate social responsibility drivers and barriers according to managers' perception; Evidence from Spanish firms

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graafland, J., & Mazereeuw-Van Der Duijn Schouten, C. (2007). The heavenly calculus and socially responsible business conduct: An explorative study among executives. Economist, 155(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-007-9053-2

Readers over time

‘11‘14‘15‘16‘17‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

42%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

32%

Researcher 3

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 8

50%

Social Sciences 4

25%

Engineering 2

13%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0