A Scoping Review of Qualitative Research Methods Used With People in Prison

37Citations
Citations of this article
170Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Researchers undertaking qualitative interview and focus group research with people in prison must consider the research methods they use, given the ethical and practical complexities of prison-based research. In particular, there are explicit and implicit coercion risks and barriers to access, privacy, and confidentiality. To examine how the challenges of conducting rigorous qualitative research with prisoners were handled, we undertook a scoping review of recruitment and data collection processes reported in qualitative research with prisoners. We searched for peer-reviewed articles of qualitative interview and focus group research with adult prisoners, published in the English language from 2005 to 2017, using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. There were 142 articles reporting on 126 studies which met the review inclusion criteria. Challenges related to coercion risk, participant recruitment, sampling, confidentiality, privacy, and working with prison-based intermediaries should be explicitly addressed and reported. Our findings highlight key considerations and contextualized strategies for recruitment and data collection for researchers who seek to conduct rigorous and ethical qualitative research with prisoners.

References Powered by Scopus

Three approaches to qualitative content analysis

29202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework

20926Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Literature review: Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups

290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Food in correctional facilities: A scoping review

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Promoting health and well-being in prisons: an analysis of one year’s prison inspection reports

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Importance of Incorporating Lived Experience in Efforts to Reduce Australian Reincarceration Rates

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abbott, P., DiGiacomo, M., Magin, P., & Hu, W. (2018). A Scoping Review of Qualitative Research Methods Used With People in Prison. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918803824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 46

64%

Researcher 10

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 23

35%

Nursing and Health Professions 19

29%

Psychology 19

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free