Telling the truth about antibiotics: Benefits, harms and moral duty in prescribing for children in primary care

5Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance represents a growing threat to global health, yet antibiotics are frequently prescribed in primary care for acute childhood illness, where there is evidence of very limited clinical effectiveness. Moral philosophy supports the need for doctors to consider wider society, including future patients, when treating present individuals, and it is clearly wrong to waste antibiotics in situations where they are largely clinically ineffective at the expense of future generations. Doctors should feel confident in applying principles of antibiotic stewardship when treating children in primary care, but they must explain these to parents. Provision of accurate, accessible information about the benefits and harms of antibiotics is key to an ethical approach to antimicrobial stewardship and to supporting shared decision making. Openness and honesty about drivers for antibiotic requests and prescribing may further allow parents to have their concerns heard and help clinicians to develop with them an understanding of shared goals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayhoe, B., Butler, C. C., Majeed, A., & Saxena, S. (2018). Telling the truth about antibiotics: Benefits, harms and moral duty in prescribing for children in primary care. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 73(9), 2298–2304. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free