Effects of Adjuvants on HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein SOSIP Trimers In Vitro

  • Ozorowski G
  • Cupo A
  • Golabek M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Native-like, soluble, recombinant SOSIP trimers of various designs and based on several env genes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) are being tested as immunogens in different animal models. These experiments almost always involve coformulating the trimers with an adjuvant to boost the magnitude of the immune responses. One factor relevant to the choice of an adjuvant is that it should not physically damage the immunogen or impede its ability to present relevant epitopes. As examples, an adjuvant formulation that includes harsh detergents could disrupt the structural integrity of a trimer, and any charged compounds in the formulation could bind to countercharged regions of the trimer and physically occlude nearby epitopes. While a few adjuvants have been tested for their potential effects on SOSIP trimers in vitro , there has been no systematic study. Here, we have assessed how nine different adjuvants of various compositions affect SOSIP trimers of the BG505 and B41 genotypes. We used negative-stain electron microscopy, thermal denaturation, and gel electrophoresis to evaluate effects on trimer integrity and immunoassays to measure effects on the presentation of various epitopes. We conclude that most of the tested adjuvants are benign from these perspectives, but some raise grounds for concern. An acidified alum formulation is highly disruptive to trimer integrity, and a DNA-based polyanionic CpG oligodeoxynucleotide adjuvant binds to trimers and occludes the trimer apex epitope for the PGT145 neutralizing antibody. The methods described here should be generalizable to protein subunit vaccines targeting various pathogens. IMPORTANCE Adjuvant formulations increase the magnitude of immune responses to vaccine antigens. They are critically important for formulation of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) vaccines intended to induce antibody production, as Env proteins are otherwise only very weakly immunogenic. The HIV-1 vaccine field now uses the well-defined structures of trimeric Env glycoproteins, like SOSIPs, to present multiple known epitopes for broad and potent neutralizing human antibodies in a native-like conformation. Successful adjuvant formulations must not disrupt how the trimers are folded, as that could adversely affect their performance as immunogens. We studied whether the various adjuvants most commonly used in animal experiments affect the integrity of two different SOSIP trimers in vitro . Most adjuvant classes are not problematic, but an aluminum sulfate formulation is highly damaging, as it exposes trimers to acidic pH and a nucleic acid-based adjuvant can bind to the trimer and block access to a key neutralizing epitope.

Figures

  • TABLE 1 Summary of adjuvants used in immunization studies of selected soluble Env proteins
  • TABLE 2 Summary of biophysical analyses of how adjuvants affect trimer stability
  • TABLE 3 Adjuvant-trimer formulations
  • FIG 1 Alum adjuvant effects on trimer stability. (A) Representative electron micrograph of BG505 SOSIP.664 trimers adsorbed to Alhydrogel, with a field of view of approximately 840 nm by 840 nm. (B) BN-PAGE analysis of reference standard BG505 trimers, (Continued on next page)
  • FIG 2 Trimer stability in the presence of ISCOMs, liposomes, and saponins. (A) Representative micrographs of BG505 trimers coformulated with ISCOMATRIX or GLA-LSQ, as indicated. (B) NS-EM analysis of BG505 or B41 trimers in the presence of ISCOMATRIX, Quil-A saponin, GLA-LSQ, or MPLA liposomes, as indicated. (C) BN-PAGE analysis of BG505 trimers coformulated with ISCOMATRIX (ISCO), GLA-LSQ, or MPLA liposomes (MPLA). The position of the bands corresponding to trimers is indicated. MW, molecular weight, in thousands. (D) The midpoint melting temperatures of BG505 or B41 trimers in the presence of the indicated concentrations of Quil-A saponin were measured by DSF.
  • FIG 3 Trimers remain intact in the presence of oil-in-water adjuvants. Representative electron micrograph (A) and BN-PAGE gel (B) of BG505 trimers after coformulation with Sigma Adjuvant System (SAS). MW indicates molecular weight markers, in thousands, and a control BG505 trimer lane is also shown. (C) NS-EM analysis of BG505 or B41 trimers in the presence of SAS or 20% (vol/vol) squalene, as indicated.
  • FIG 4 CpG (ODN 1826) but not poly(I·C) modulates the thermostability of BG505 and B41 trimers. NS-EM (A) and BN-PAGE (B) analyses of BG505 or B41 trimers after coformulation with either CpG (ODN 1826) or poly(I·C), as indicated. MW, molecular weight, in thousands. (C and D) DSF analyses show that CpG (ODN 1826) stabilizes the BG505 trimers but destabilizes B41 trimers, while poly(I·C) has no effect on the thermostability of either trimer. The midpoint melting temperatures are recorded on each panel.
  • FIG 5 ELISA measurements of how adjuvants affect antibody binding to trimers. (A) The adjuvants indicated by the color scheme below the plots were added in a 50- l volume at twice the indicated concentration to wells containing captured His-tagged BG505 trimers for a 4-h period at room temperature. The test antibodies (as indicated above each graph) were then added in a 50- l volume for 4 h, the bound antibodies were detected, and the resulting OD450 value was recorded. (B) As for panel A, except that His-tagged B41 trimers were used. (C) As for panel A, except that the adjuvant-trimer incubation period was reduced to 30 min. The adjuvant was then either washed out (left) or not (right) before the addition of the PGT145 antibody and the completion of the assay. (D) 2G12-captured BG505 trimers were exposed to the indicated adjuvants for 1 h before PGT145 IgG was added for 1 h. The control group involved the addition of buffer only. Bound PGT145 was then detected and the resulting OD450 value recorded.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ozorowski, G., Cupo, A., Golabek, M., LoPiccolo, M., Ketas, T. A., Cavallary, M., … Moore, J. P. (2018). Effects of Adjuvants on HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein SOSIP Trimers In Vitro. Journal of Virology, 92(13). https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00381-18

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

74%

Researcher 6

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Immunology and Microbiology 10

36%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

32%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

25%

Chemistry 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0