Less meat in the shopping basket. The effect on meat purchases of higher prices, an information nudge and the combination: a randomised controlled trial

13Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Reduced meat consumption benefits human and planetary health. Modelling studies have demonstrated the significant health and environmental gains that could be achieved through fiscal measures targeting meat. Adding other interventions may enhance the effect of a fiscal measure. The current study aimed to examine the effect of higher meat prices, an information nudge and a combination of both measures on meat purchases in a three-dimensional virtual supermarket. Methods: A parallel designed randomised controlled trial with four conditions was performed. Participants (≥ 18 years) were randomly assigned to the control condition or one of the experimental conditions: a 30% price increase for meat (‘Price condition’), an information nudge about the environmental impact of meat production and consumers’ role in that regard (‘Information nudge condition’) or a combination of both (‘Combination condition’). Participants were asked to shop for their household for one week. The primary outcome was the difference in the total amount of meat purchased in grams per household per week. Results: Between 22 June 2020 and 28 August 2020, participants were recruited and randomly assigned to the control and experimental conditions. The final sample included 533 participants. In the ‘Combination condition’, − 386 g (95% CI: − 579, − 193) meat was purchased compared with the ‘Control condition’. Compared to the ‘Control condition’ less meat was purchased in the ‘Price condition’ (− 144 g (95%CI: − 331, 43)), although not statistically significant, whereas a similar amount of meat was purchased in the ‘Information nudge condition’ (1 g (95%CI: − 188, 189)). Conclusion: Achieving the most pronounced effects on reduced meat purchases will require a policy mixture of pricing and informational nudging. Less meat is purchased in a virtual supermarket after raising the meat price by 30% combined with an information nudge. The results could be used to design evidence-based policy measures to reduce meat purchases. Trial registration: The trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register identifier NL8628. Registered on 18/05/2020. ICTRP Search Portal (who.int) NTR (trialregister.nl).

References Powered by Scopus

Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

6819Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association between total, processed, red and white meat consumption and all-cause, CVD and IHD mortality: A meta-analysis of cohort studies

373Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global, regional and national consumption of major food groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis including 266 country-specific nutrition surveys worldwide

345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Synergies of interventions to promote pro-environmental behaviors – A meta-analysis of experimental studies

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quitting livestock farming: transfarmation pathways and factors of change from post-livestock farmers’ accounts

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gradual behaviour change towards meat reduction revisited: Applying the decisional balance scale in a Dutch study

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vellinga, R. E., Eykelenboom, M., Olthof, M. R., Steenhuis, I. H. M., de Jonge, R., & Temme, E. H. M. (2022). Less meat in the shopping basket. The effect on meat purchases of higher prices, an information nudge and the combination: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13535-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

73%

Researcher 4

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

36%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

36%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

18%

Engineering 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free