Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Prehospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Identification

11Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: Timely prehospital diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are required to achieve optimal outcomes. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are platforms designed to integrate multiple data and can aid with management decisions in the prehospital environment. The review aim was to describe the accuracy of CDSS and individual components in the prehospital ACS management. Methods: This systematic review examined the current literature regarding the accuracy of CDSS for ACS in the prehospital setting, the influence of computer-aided decision-making and of 4 components: electrocardiogram, biomarkers, patient history, and examination findings. The impact of these components on sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values was assessed. Results: A total of 11,439 articles were identified from a search of databases, of which 199 were screened against the eligibility criteria. Eight studies were found to meet the eligibility and quality criteria. There was marked heterogeneity between studies which precluded formal meta-analysis. However, individual components analysis found that patient history led to significant improvement in the sensitivity and negative predictive values. CDSS which incorporated all 4 components tended to show higher sensitivities and negative predictive values. CDSS incorporating computer-aided electrocardiogram diagnosis showed higher specificities and positive predictive values. Conclusions: Although heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, this review emphasizes the potential of ACS CDSS in prehospital environments that incorporate patient history in addition to integration of multiple components. The higher sensitivity of certain components, along with higher specificity of computer-aided decision-making, highlights the opportunity for developing an integrated algorithm with computer-aided decision support.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

17526Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

14023Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quadas-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

10140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Prehospital diagnostic algorithm for acute coronary syndrome using machine learning: a prospective observational study

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prediction of acute neurovascular syndromes with prehospital clinical features witnessed by bystanders

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prediction of emergency department presentations for acute coronary syndrome using a machine learning approach

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knoery, C. R., Heaton, J., Polson, R., Bond, R., Iftikhar, A., Rjoob, K., … Leslie, S. J. (2020, September 1). Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Prehospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Identification. Critical Pathways in Cardiology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000217

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Researcher 4

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

61%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

22%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

11%

Computer Science 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0