Food allergy immunotherapy: Oral immunotherapy and epicutaneous immunotherapy

59Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IgE-mediated food allergy remains a significant and growing problem across the globe. Of the various treatment modalities, oral immunotherapy (OIT) and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) have been the best studied. Across various studies of OIT for egg, milk, and peanut allergy, strong levels of desensitization have been shown. With egg and peanut OIT, a limited remission, or sustained unresponsiveness (SU), has further been demonstrated. These advances have been further validated by successful phase 2 and phase 3 studies of peanut OIT. EPIT, using daily administrations of a proprietary patch, demonstrated efficacy as well as safety and tolerability in parallel phase 2 studies; however, its phase 3 study did not meet its primary efficacy outcome. Despite its good track record of desensitization, the safety and tolerability of OIT has remained a question. EPIT, on the other hand, has proven safe and tolerable; however, the adequacy of its desensitization has remained to be determined. As OIT and EPIT continue their march toward regulatory review, optimizations for immunotherapy and novel therapies continue to be developed providing hope for food allergy patients everywhere.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, E. H., & Burks, A. W. (2020, June 1). Food allergy immunotherapy: Oral immunotherapy and epicutaneous immunotherapy. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14220

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free