Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is still unclear. The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tDCS in improving symptoms in patients with KOA. Methods: The following electronic databases were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The search was performed from the inception dates to April 30, 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for pooled data were calculated. A random-effects model was used for the data analyses. The primary outcomes were pain and physical function. Secondary outcomes included stiffness, mobility performance, quality of life, pressure pain tolerance, and plasma levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Results: This meta-analysis included 13 RCTs. tDCS was significantly associated with pain decrease compared with sham tDCS (SMD = −0.62, 95% CI −0.87 to −0.37, P < 0.00001). When comparing tDCS plus other non-tDCS with sham tDCS plus other non-tDCS, there was no longer a significant association with pain decrease (SMD = −0.45, 95% CI −1.08 to 0.17, P = 0.16). The changes in physical function were not significantly different between the tDCS and sham tDCS groups (SMD = −0.09, 95% CI −0.56 to 0.38, P = 0.71). When comparing tDCS plus other non-tDCS with sham tDCS plus other non-tDCS, there was still no significant association with improvement in physical function (SMD = −0.66, 95% CI −1.63 to 0.30, P = 0.18). There was no significant difference with improvement in stiffness (SMD = −0.21, 95% CI −0.77 to 0.34, P = 0.45), mobility performance (SMD = 4.58, 95% CI −9.21 to 18.37, P = 0.51), quality of life (SMD = −7.01, 95% CI −22.61 to 8.59, P = 0.38), and pressure pain tolerance (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI −0.09 to 0.69, P = 0.13). There was a statistically significant reduction in plasma levels of BDNF (SMD = −13.57, 95% CI −24.23 to −2.92, P = 0.01). Conclusion: In conclusion, tDCS could significantly alleviate pain, but it might have no efficacy in physical function, stiffness, mobility performance, quality of life, and pressure pain tolerance among patients with KOA.

References Powered by Scopus

Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

11539Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

10105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

10005Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The effects of combined transcranial direct Current stimulation with physiotherapy for physical function in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A New Way to Treat Central Nervous System Dysfunction Caused by Musculoskeletal Injuries Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Narrative Review

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of gluteal muscle central activation in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, J. M., Li, C. C., Wang, Y., Li, J. Y., Xu, J. M., Liang, M. G., … Chen, Z. H. (2024). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthritis Care and Research, 76(3), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25249

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

40%

Researcher 2

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

40%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

40%

Computer Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free