Comparative effects of three doses of intravenous ketorolac or morphine on emesis and analgesia for restorative dental surgery in children

47Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The optimal dose of intravenous ketorolac tromethamine (ketorolac), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug has not been determined in children. There are only limited published data on the use of intravenous ketorolac for paediatric analgesia. This study compares the analgesic and emetic effect of three different doses of ketorolac with morphine in paediatric dental surgical out-patients. Methods: Following institutional approval and parental consent, 120 ASA I or II children, age 2-10 yr were randomized to four groups and received ketorolac 0.75, 1.0, and 1.5 mg · kg-1 or morphine 0.1 mg · kg-1 iv at induction of a standardized anaesthetic. At 15 and 30 min after arrival in the recovery room a blinded observer assessed pain using the Objective Pain Score (OPS). Twenty-four hours after surgery a telephone interview was carried out with a parent at home. Results: There were no differences in demographic data, anaesthesia time, recovery and day-care unit time, OPS and postoperative analgesic requirements in the four groups. Postoperative vomiting in the first 24 hr occurred more frequently in the morphine group than in the other groups (P < 0.0166). No patient had excessive surgical bleeding. Conclusions: Ketorolac, in all doses studied (0.75, 1.0 and 1.5 mg · kg-1) was as effective an analgesic as morphine 0.1 mg · kg-1 given intravenously at induction to children having restorative dental surgery. Its use was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative vomiting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Purday, J. P., Reichert, C. C., & Merrick, P. M. (1996). Comparative effects of three doses of intravenous ketorolac or morphine on emesis and analgesia for restorative dental surgery in children. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 43(3), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03011738

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free