Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination

37Citations
Citations of this article
173Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this in study was the evaluation of treatment outcomes after using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination in growing class III patients. Methods: Treatment of 16 children (mean age 9.5 ± 1.3 years) was investigated clinically and by means of pre-and post-treatment cephalograms. Changes in sagittal and vertical, and dental and skeletal values were evaluated and tested for statistically significant differences. Results: All mini-implants remained stable during treatment. Mean treatment duration was 5.8 ± 1.7 months. There was a significant improvement in skeletal sagittal values: SNA, +2.0°; SNB, -1.2°; ANB, +3.2°; WITS appraisal, +4.1 mm and overjet, +2.7 mm. No significant changes were found concerning vertical skeletal relationships and upper incisor inclination. In relation to A point, the upper first molars moved mesially about 0.4 mm (P = 0.134). Conclusions: The hybrid hyrax-facemask combination seems to be effective for orthopaedic treatment in growing class III patients. Unwanted maxillary dental movements can be avoided due to stable skeletal anchorage. © 2013 Nienkemper et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nienkemper, M., Wilmes, B., Pauls, A., & Drescher, D. (2013). Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination. Progress in Orthodontics, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free